Ридинг-семинар «Analytics» по статье Тимоти Уильямсона «A risky challenge for intransitive preferences»
25 ноября прошла встреча ридинг-семинара «Analytics», которая была посвящена обсуждению статьи Тимоти Уильямсона «A risky challenge for intransitive preferences»
Аннотация статьи:
Philosophers have spent a great deal of time debating whether intransitive preferences can be rational. I present a risky decision that poses a challenge for the defender of intransitivity. The defender of intransitivity faces a trilemma and must either: (i) reject the rationality of intransitive preferences, (ii) deny State-wise Dominance, or (iii) accept the bizarre verdict that you can be required to pay to relabel the tickets of a fair lottery. If we take the first horn, then we have a synchronic refutation of intransitivity, an improvement on widely criticized diachronic arguments. I sketch possible responses that may rescue intransitivity and argue that each response is possible but generates an explanatory debt. I conclude by showing how the challenge here clarifies the foundations of decision theory without transitivity, conditional on some explanatory debt being payable.
