We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Elena Dragalina-Chernaya's article was published in the series "Studies in Universal Logic" by Birkhäuser publishing house

Elena Dragalina-Chernaya's article "Logical Hylomorphism Revisited: Aristotle, Tarski, and Corcoran" was published in the monograph "Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truths in Honor of John Corcoran (1937-2021)" within the series Studies in Universal Logic by Birkhäuser publishing house.

Elena Dragalina-Chernaya's article was published in the series "Studies in Universal Logic" by Birkhäuser publishing house

Abstract:

This paper proposes an approach to the demarcation of formal ontology and formal epistemology based on the dichotomy between substantial and dynamic models of logical hylomorphism. Substantial hylomorphism considers logic as a theory of higher-order formal objects which turns their properties into rules of inference. Dynamic hylomorphism concerns goals-directed and rules-governed structured actions of reasoning agents rather than objects. The paper shows the significance of Corcoran’s formal methodology for balancing ontologically and epistemologically oriented versions of logical hylomorphism.

 

Logical Hylomorphism Revisited: Aristotle, Tarski, and Corcoran | SpringerLink